Course Reviews

I based this off of Wan Shen Lim's CMU Course Review format. Wan's practice of not only listing his courses, but also summarizing what else was happening in the semester + his additional responsibilities contextualized what he wrote; I think all reviews should do this, and I hope that I do the system justice.

Course Evaluation:

• A course without stars might still be objectively good.
• ☆ = A good class that was, in hindsight, worth spending a quarter on.
• ☆☆ = A class that changed how I do research or my research process.